Product Details
Color Details
Size DetailsFrequently Asked Questions
Can I get prescription lenses in the Fossil Fos3082 sunglasses?
What size are the Fossil Fos3082 sunglasses?
Do Fossil Fos3082 sunglasses have UV protection?
What face shapes work best with cat-eye sunglasses like the Fos3082?
What comes included with the Fossil Fos3082 sunglasses?
Who manufactures Fossil eyewear?
Compare With Similar Frames
How the Fossil Fos3082 Sunglasses stacks up against the closest alternatives we carry.
- Slimmer, more delicate cat-eye frame for a subtler look
- Slightly smaller 54mm lens width may fit narrower faces better
- Same prescription-ready capability and UV protection
Read the full comparison
Fossil Fos3082 vs. Fos3083: Chunky vs. Slim Cat-Eye
Both the Fos3082 and Fos3083 are women's cat-eye sunglasses from Fossil's modern vintage collection, but they take different approaches to the classic silhouette. The Fos3082 features a chunkier frame with rounded, slightly exaggerated edges and a distinctive metallic accent band around each lens. The Fos3083 opts for a slimmer, more delicate cat-eye with a 54mm lens width (vs. 56mm on the 3082) and a more understated design.
If you want a frame that makes a statement and offers maximum sun coverage, the Fos3082 is the better choice. The larger lens size and bold metallic detail give it more presence, and customers have noted they appreciate the chunky, sophisticated look. The Fos3083 works better if you prefer a subtler cat-eye that won't dominate your face—it's ideal for narrower faces or anyone who wants the cat-eye shape without the extra visual weight.
Both models are prescription-ready, offer 100% UV protection, and come with a case and cleaning cloth. They're priced nearly identically ($40–$49), so your decision comes down to style preference: bold and architectural (Fos3082) or slim and understated (Fos3083).
Fossil Fos3082 vs. Fossil 3103: Size and Color Options
The Fossil 3103 is another cat-eye option in the Fossil lineup, but it's built for a smaller fit. With a 52mm lens width and 20mm bridge, the 3103 is better suited to petite faces, while the Fos3082's 56mm lens and 16mm bridge fit a wider range of face sizes. The 3103 also offers more color variety—including blue crystal, pink crystal, and havana brown—if you're looking for something beyond classic black or tortoise.
The trade-off is price: the Fossil 3103 runs $64–$119, significantly higher than the Fos3082's $43 price point. Both frames are acetate, prescription-ready, and feature the same vintage-inspired Fossil aesthetic. If you want maximum value and a versatile medium fit, the Fos3082 is the smarter buy. If you have a smaller face or want a wider color palette, the 3103 is worth the extra investment.
At a Glance
Fossil Fos3083 Sunglasses
Pros:
- Slimmer, more delicate cat-eye frame for a subtler look
- Slightly smaller 54mm lens width may fit narrower faces better
- Same prescription-ready capability and UV protection
- Similar price range ($40–$49)
Cons:
- Less distinctive—lacks the metallic accent band detail of the 3082
- Smaller lens size provides less coverage
- More understated design may not make as bold a statement
Fossil 3103 Sunglasses
Pros:
- Available in more color options (5 colors including blue crystal and pink crystal)
- Same cat-eye shape and acetate construction
- Prescription-ready with full-rim design
- Slightly smaller 52mm lens width for petite faces
Cons:
- Higher price point ($64–$119 vs. $43)
- Smaller lens size (52mm vs. 56mm) offers less sun coverage
- Different bridge width (20mm vs. 16mm) may not fit all nose shapes as well