Frequently Asked Questions
Are the Kliik K-787 eyeglasses prescription-ready?
What size face do the Kliik K-787 frames fit?
What material are the Kliik K-787 eyeglasses made from?
How do I care for acetate eyeglass frames?
Are cat-eye glasses suitable for progressive lenses?
What face shapes do cat-eye glasses flatter?
Compare With Similar Frames
How the Kliik K-787 Eyeglasses stacks up against the closest alternatives we carry.
- Same Kliik quality and smaller-face fit philosophy
- Similar price point and acetate construction
- Alternative shape option within the same brand
- Established designer brand with strong recognition
- Acetate construction with playful design details
- Competitive pricing with broader availability
Read the full comparison
Kliik K-787 vs. Similar Cat-Eye Frames
If you're considering the Kliik K-787, you're likely weighing it against other women's cat-eye acetate frames in the $100–$200 range. Here's how it stacks up against two strong alternatives in our catalog.
Kliik K-787 vs. Kliik K-713
Both frames share Kliik Denmark's commitment to smaller-face sizing and premium acetate construction, but they serve different style preferences. The K-787 offers a classic cat-eye silhouette with upswept corners, while the K-713 presents a different frame shape. Both use handmade acetate with rich, layered color patterns and saddle bridge designs for comfort. If you're loyal to the Kliik fit and quality but want to explore shape options, the K-713 is worth comparing side-by-side. Price-wise, they're nearly identical ($130–$185), so your decision comes down to which shape better complements your features and personal style.
Kliik K-787 vs. Kate Spade Atalina
The Kate Spade Atalina is a popular cat-eye acetate frame with playful design details and strong brand recognition. While both frames use quality acetate and target the women's market, the key difference is fit philosophy: Kliik designs specifically for smaller faces with properly scaled proportions (49-16-135mm), while Kate Spade frames typically run closer to standard sizing. If you've found that most designer frames feel too large or slide down your nose, the K-787's smaller-face engineering gives it a clear advantage. The Atalina may offer more color variety and brand cachet, but the K-787 delivers superior fit for petite features. Both are prescription-ready and durable, so your choice depends on whether fit precision or designer name matters more to you.
Bottom line: Choose the Kliik K-787 if you have a smaller face and want frames that fit properly from day one, with Scandinavian design sensibility and quality acetate construction. Choose the K-713 if you prefer Kliik's fit but want a different shape. Choose the Kate Spade Atalina if you prioritize brand recognition and your face measurements fall within standard sizing ranges.
At a Glance
Kliik K-713 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Same Kliik quality and smaller-face fit philosophy
- Similar price point and acetate construction
- Alternative shape option within the same brand
Cons:
- Different frame shape may not suit those specifically seeking cat-eye style
- Color options may differ from the K-787 palette
Kate Spade Atalina Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Established designer brand with strong recognition
- Acetate construction with playful design details
- Competitive pricing with broader availability
Cons:
- Not specifically designed for smaller faces like Kliik
- May run larger in proportions, potentially less suitable for petite features



