Product Details
Color Details
Size DetailsFrequently Asked Questions
Are the Oakley Frogskins Rx A 8137A prescription-ready?
What does the 'A' mean in Frogskins Rx A 8137A?
What is O-Matter frame material and why does it matter?
How do the Frogskins Rx compare to the Oakley Holbrook Rx?
What is Oakley's Three-Point Fit technology?
Can I use my FSA or HSA to purchase Oakley Frogskins Rx eyeglasses?
Compare With Similar Frames
How the Oakley Frogskins Rx A 8137A Eyeglasses stacks up against the closest alternatives we carry.
- Larger, squarer lenses provide better side coverage and less light leakage
- More modern, masculine aesthetic with prominent metal rivets
- Slightly lower starting price ($92.13 vs $172.00)
- More subtle, minimalist design for those who want less attention
- Similar price range to Frogskins Rx A
- Square frame shape works well for round or oval faces
Read the full comparison
Frogskins Rx A vs. Holbrook Rx: Which Oakley Prescription Frame Is Right for You?
If you're choosing between Oakley's two most iconic prescription frames, you're facing a decision that thousands of eyewear enthusiasts debate every year. Both the Frogskins Rx A 8137A and the Holbrook Rx 8156 deliver Oakley's legendary quality, but they serve different style preferences and fit needs.
The Design Difference
The Frogskins Rx A brings pure 1980s retro energy. Its square lenses are slightly smaller and more curved, with the signature keyhole bridge that defined the original 1985 design. The Holbrook Rx, introduced in 2010, takes inspiration from 1940s-60s screen heroes with larger, squarer lenses and prominent metal rivets on the frame. The Frogskins says "vintage cool," while the Holbrook says "rugged explorer."
Fit and Coverage
The Holbrook Rx offers better side coverage thanks to its larger lens size, which means less light leakage from the periphery. The Frogskins Rx A, with its low bridge fit design, is specifically optimized for faces with lower nose bridges or higher cheekbones. Both frames use O-Matter construction and Three-Point Fit technology, so comfort is excellent on both—it's really about which lens size and bridge design suits your face better.
Price and Value
The Holbrook Rx starts at $92.13, making it the more budget-friendly option, while the Frogskins Rx A starts at $172.00. However, the Frogskins' cultural cachet and instantly recognizable silhouette may justify the premium for those who want a frame with serious heritage.
Our Take
Choose the Frogskins Rx A 8137A if you want the frame that put Oakley on the pop culture map, prefer a more retro aesthetic, need a low bridge fit, or simply want to own a piece of eyewear history. Choose the Holbrook Rx 8156 if you prioritize maximum coverage, prefer a more modern masculine look, want to save some money, or have a larger face that benefits from bigger lenses. Either way, you're getting authentic Oakley engineering and a frame that'll last for years.
At a Glance
Oakley Holbrook Rx 8156 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Larger, squarer lenses provide better side coverage and less light leakage
- More modern, masculine aesthetic with prominent metal rivets
- Slightly lower starting price ($92.13 vs $172.00)
- Inspired by 1940s-60s screen heroes with a rugged exploration vibe
Cons:
- Less retro/vintage appeal than the iconic Frogskins design
- Larger frame may not suit smaller faces as well
- Heavier overall feel compared to the Frogskins' lighter construction
Oakley Plank 2.0 8081 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- More subtle, minimalist design for those who want less attention
- Similar price range to Frogskins Rx A
- Square frame shape works well for round or oval faces
- O-Matter frame construction for lightweight durability
Cons:
- Lacks the iconic heritage and cultural cachet of the Frogskins
- Less distinctive styling—won't make as much of a statement
- Not as widely recognized or celebrated in eyewear culture