Product Details
Color Details
Size DetailsFrequently Asked Questions
Are the Ray-Ban Cats 1000 RB4126 sunglasses prescription-ready?
What face shapes work best with the Ray-Ban Cats 1000?
Do Ray-Ban Cats 1000 sunglasses have polarized lenses?
What is the difference between Ray-Ban Cats 1000 and Erika?
What materials are Ray-Ban Cats 1000 frames made from?
What comes included with Ray-Ban Cats 1000 sunglasses?
Compare With Similar Frames
How the Ray-Ban Cats 1000 4126 Sunglasses stacks up against the closest alternatives we carry.
- Lighter weight with rubberized nylon frame and thin metal temples
- More subtle, casual look with softer panthos shape
- Slightly lower price point (typically $105.70-$197.00)
- Larger oversized lenses for maximum sun coverage
- Classic Jackie O vintage glamour aesthetic
- Acetate construction similar to Cats 1000
Read the full comparison
Ray-Ban Cats 1000 vs. Erika vs. Jackie Ohh: Which Feminine Frame Is Right for You?
If you're drawn to Ray-Ban's feminine styles, you've likely encountered the Cats 1000 RB4126, Erika RB4171, and Jackie Ohh RB4101. All three offer retro-inspired looks with modern comfort, but each brings a distinct personality to your wardrobe.
Cats 1000: Bold Butterfly Coverage
The Cats 1000 strikes a balance between vintage glamour and everyday wearability. Its butterfly shape with soft cat-eye curves provides generous coverage—ideal if you want serious sun protection without going full Jackie O oversized. The acetate frame feels substantial but not heavy, and the gradient lenses are particularly practical for urban environments. At $125.15-$207.00, it sits in the mid-range and works beautifully for oval, heart, and square faces. Choose the Cats 1000 if you want a frame that makes a statement without overwhelming your features.
Erika: Casual and Lightweight
The Erika takes a softer approach with its rounded panthos shape and barely-there cat-eye lift. It's lighter (thanks to the rubberized nylon front and thin metal temples) and more casual—perfect for everyday wear when you want effortless style. The Erika typically runs $105.70-$197.00, making it the most budget-friendly option. However, the trade-off is less coverage and a more understated look. If you prefer subtle to bold, the Erika is your frame.
Jackie Ohh: Maximum Glamour
The Jackie Ohh goes all-in on vintage drama with its oversized lenses and classic 1960s silhouette. It offers the most sun coverage of the three but can overwhelm smaller faces. At $131.48-$244.00, it's also the priciest. Choose the Jackie Ohh if you want full-on retro glamour and have the face size to carry it.
Our take: The Cats 1000 is the Goldilocks option—bolder than the Erika but more wearable than the Jackie Ohh. Its butterfly shape flatters a wide range of faces, the gradient lenses are genuinely functional, and the price-to-style ratio is excellent. If you want one versatile pair that works from brunch to beach, the Cats 1000 delivers.
At a Glance
Ray-Ban Erika 4171 Sunglasses
Pros:
- Lighter weight with rubberized nylon frame and thin metal temples
- More subtle, casual look with softer panthos shape
- Slightly lower price point (typically $105.70-$197.00)
- Versatile unisex styling that works for more face shapes
Cons:
- Less coverage and sun protection than the Cats 1000
- Softer cat-eye detail may not suit those wanting a bolder statement
- Rubberized finish can show wear over time
- Less retro/vintage aesthetic compared to the Cats 1000
Ray-Ban Jackie Ohh 4101 Sunglasses
Pros:
- Larger oversized lenses for maximum sun coverage
- Classic Jackie O vintage glamour aesthetic
- Acetate construction similar to Cats 1000
- Prescription-ready with full UV protection
Cons:
- Higher price range ($131.48-$244.00)
- Larger size may overwhelm smaller faces
- Less variety in modern colorways
- Straighter temple design compared to Cats 1000's curved fit