Frequently Asked Questions
Are the Saint Laurent SL 737 MICA THIN sunglasses prescription-ready?
What face shapes work best with the SL 737 MICA THIN cat-eye frame?
What is the difference between acetate and regular plastic frames?
How does the SL 737 MICA THIN differ from the original SL 276 MICA?
Do these sunglasses provide UV protection?
What comes included with the Saint Laurent SL 737 MICA THIN sunglasses?
Compare With Similar Frames
How the Saint Laurent SL 737 MICA THIN Sunglasses stacks up against the closest alternatives we carry.
- Lower price point ($186.78–$233.18 vs $235.51–$239.19)
- Classic Saint Laurent cat-eye design with proven popularity
- Multiple color options available
- Iconic KATE silhouette with celebrity following
- Sharper, more dramatic cat-eye angles for bold statement
- New Wave collection offers edgier aesthetic
Read the full comparison
Saint Laurent SL 737 MICA THIN vs. Other Saint Laurent Cat-Eye Styles
If you're drawn to Saint Laurent's cat-eye sunglasses, you're likely weighing a few options. The SL 737 MICA THIN sits in a sweet spot between classic elegance and contemporary refinement, but how does it compare to other models in our collection?
SL 737 MICA THIN vs. SL 318 Classic
The Saint Laurent Classic SL 318 offers a more traditional cat-eye at a slightly lower price ($186.78–$233.18). If budget is your primary concern, the SL 318 delivers authentic Saint Laurent style with prescription-ready construction. However, the SL 737 MICA THIN represents the brand's latest design evolution—the thinner acetate construction feels noticeably lighter and more modern, and the refined proportions work better on a wider range of face shapes. The MICA THIN's 54mm lens width also provides slightly more coverage than many classic styles, making it ideal if you want sun protection without oversized frames.
SL 737 MICA THIN vs. SL 214 KATE
The Saint Laurent New Wave SL 214 KATE ($308.75–$318.47) takes a bolder approach with sharper, more dramatic angles. The KATE is a celebrity favorite and makes an unmistakable statement, but that aggressive styling can feel less versatile for everyday wear. The MICA THIN offers a softer, more approachable cat-eye that transitions seamlessly from casual to polished looks. If you want sunglasses that work as well at brunch as they do at a gallery opening, the MICA THIN's balanced proportions and refined acetate construction make it the more practical choice. The KATE is for those who want maximum drama; the MICA THIN is for those who want enduring style.
Why Choose the SL 737 MICA THIN?
The SL 737 MICA THIN represents Saint Laurent's commitment to evolving its iconic designs. You're getting the best-selling MICA silhouette—proven to flatter a wide range of faces—reimagined with a thinner, lighter acetate construction that feels contemporary without chasing trends. At $235.51–$239.19, it's competitively priced within the Saint Laurent range, and the prescription-ready frame means you're not sacrificing function for fashion. If you value refined design, all-day comfort, and a cat-eye that feels fresh rather than retro, the MICA THIN is your frame.
At a Glance
Saint Laurent Classic SL 318 Sunglasses
Pros:
- Lower price point ($186.78–$233.18 vs $235.51–$239.19)
- Classic Saint Laurent cat-eye design with proven popularity
- Multiple color options available
- Prescription-ready with full-rim construction
Cons:
- Not part of the latest Fall-Winter 2024 collection
- Lacks the refined thin acetate construction of the SL 737
- May have a slightly heavier feel compared to the MICA THIN design
- Less modern aesthetic than the updated MICA THIN silhouette
Saint Laurent New Wave SL 214 KATE Sunglasses
Pros:
- Iconic KATE silhouette with celebrity following
- Sharper, more dramatic cat-eye angles for bold statement
- New Wave collection offers edgier aesthetic
- Prescription-ready construction
Cons:
- Higher price point ($308.75–$318.47)
- More aggressive styling may not suit all face shapes
- Sharper angles can be less comfortable for extended wear
- Less versatile for everyday use compared to MICA THIN's refined design



