Product Details
Color Details
Size DetailsFrequently Asked Questions
Are Under Armour UA5009 eyeglasses prescription-ready?
What size Under Armour UA5009 should I choose?
Are acetate frames more durable than plastic?
Will these glasses stay on during sports and exercise?
Can I add clip-on sunglasses to the UA5009 frames?
What is Under Armour's warranty on eyeglasses?
Compare With Similar Frames
How the Under Armour Ua5009 Eyeglasses stacks up against the closest alternatives we carry.
- Iconic Tommy Hilfiger brand recognition
- Similar price point and acetate construction
- Classic preppy styling
- Nike's established reputation in sports eyewear
- Similar athletic performance focus
- Proven durability for active wear
- Italian design and craftsmanship
- Established sports eyewear heritage
- Premium brand recognition
Read the full comparison
Under Armour UA5009 vs. Similar Sport-Inspired Eyeglasses
Choosing prescription eyeglasses that balance performance, style, and value can be challenging. Here's how the Under Armour UA5009 compares to other popular sport-inspired frames in our collection.
Under Armour UA5009 vs. Tommy Hilfiger TH1549
Both frames target the casual-athletic aesthetic with rectangular acetate construction and similar pricing ($54-$119 for Under Armour vs. $52-$153 for Tommy Hilfiger). The key difference lies in design intent: Under Armour emphasizes performance features like wire-core temples with rubber grips for secure fit during activity, while Tommy Hilfiger leans toward classic American preppy styling. If you need glasses that transition from the gym to everyday wear, the UA5009's athletic engineering gives it an edge. If brand heritage and traditional styling matter more, the TH1549 offers iconic Tommy Hilfiger design.
Under Armour UA5009 vs. Nike 7240
This is the classic Under Armour versus Nike matchup in eyewear form. Both brands bring serious athletic credibility and design frames for active lifestyles. The Nike 7240 ($122-$141) sits at a higher price point, reflecting Nike's premium positioning in sports eyewear. Both offer durable construction and secure fit features. Your choice may come down to brand preference and budget—the UA5009 delivers comparable performance features at a more accessible price, while Nike offers its established reputation in sports optics. Consider which brand's fit and styling you prefer, as both will handle an active routine.
Under Armour UA5009 vs. Carrera 8825
Carrera brings Italian design heritage and motorsports DNA to the comparison, priced at $128-$129. While Carrera frames are sport-inspired, they emphasize European styling and luxury positioning over pure athletic function. The UA5009 is purpose-built for active wear with features like non-slip temple grips, while Carrera balances performance with fashion-forward design. If you want frames that look sporty but prioritize style, Carrera is compelling. If you need glasses that genuinely perform during workouts and daily activity, Under Armour's functional design delivers.
Bottom line: The Under Armour UA5009 offers the best value for customers who prioritize athletic performance features and secure fit at an accessible price. Its acetate construction, grip technology, and sports-focused engineering make it ideal for active lifestyles, while the rectangular styling remains versatile enough for everyday wear.
At a Glance
Tommy Hilfiger TH1549 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Iconic Tommy Hilfiger brand recognition
- Similar price point and acetate construction
- Classic preppy styling
Cons:
- Less focused on athletic performance features
- May lack the grip technology of Under Armour
- Not specifically designed for active lifestyles
Nike 7240 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Nike's established reputation in sports eyewear
- Similar athletic performance focus
- Proven durability for active wear
Cons:
- Higher price point ($122-$141 vs $54-$119)
- May have different fit characteristics
- Different brand aesthetic
Carrera 8825 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Italian design and craftsmanship
- Established sports eyewear heritage
- Premium brand recognition
Cons:
- Slightly higher starting price
- Different brand identity (motorsports vs. training)
- May prioritize style over pure performance features