Product Details
Color Details
Size DetailsFrequently Asked Questions
Are the Chesterfield Chesterf864 frames prescription-ready?
What are the benefits of titanium frames compared to regular metal frames?
What face shapes work best with round eyeglass frames?
Can titanium eyeglass frames be adjusted at home?
What size options are available for the Chesterfield Chesterf864?
Are Chesterfield titanium frames durable for everyday use?
Compare With Similar Frames
How the Chesterfield Chesterf864 Eyeglasses stacks up against the closest alternatives we carry.
- Rectangular shape provides more angular contrast for round faces
- Similar metal construction and quality
- Comparable price point ($85-$86)
- Similar Chesterfield quality and construction
- Comparable pricing at $88.25
- Alternative frame shape for different style preferences
Read the full comparison
Chesterfield Chesterf864 vs. Similar Chesterfield Frames
If you're considering the Chesterfield Chesterf864, you might also be weighing other Chesterfield metal frames in the same price range. Here's how the Chesterf864 compares to two popular alternatives in our collection.
Chesterf864 vs. Chesterfield 55XL
The main decision here comes down to frame shape. The Chesterf864 features a round lens shape that softens angular features and works particularly well for square or rectangular faces. The 55XL offers a rectangular frame that creates contrast for rounder faces. Both are full-rim metal frames with similar build quality, but the Chesterf864's titanium construction makes it noticeably lighter—ideal if you wear glasses all day and want to minimize pressure on your nose and ears. The 55XL's XL sizing may better accommodate larger faces, while the Chesterf864's two size options (49mm and 51mm) cover small to large ranges. Price-wise, they're nearly identical, with the 55XL at $85-$86 and the Chesterf864 at $97.94. If lightweight comfort and hypoallergenic properties matter to you, the Chesterf864's titanium construction justifies the small price difference.
Chesterf864 vs. Chesterfield Chesterf51
Both the Chesterf864 and Chesterf51 come from Chesterfield's core eyeglasses line and sit at similar price points ($97.94 vs. $88.25). The Chesterf864's round shape offers versatility—it works in both professional and casual settings and tends to be more forgiving across different face shapes. The Chesterf51's specific frame shape will determine which face types it flatters most. If you have sensitive skin or metal allergies, the Chesterf864's titanium construction is hypoallergenic and nickel-free, which can prevent irritation that sometimes occurs with standard metal frames. Both frames are prescription-ready and built to Chesterfield's quality standards, so your choice comes down to frame shape preference and whether the titanium benefits matter for your daily wear.
Why Choose the Chesterf864?
The Chesterfield Chesterf864 stands out for its titanium construction at an accessible price point. You get the lightweight comfort and durability of titanium—a material typically found in frames costing significantly more—combined with a versatile round shape that works across multiple face types and style contexts. If you prioritize all-day comfort, have sensitive skin, or want frames that will hold up to years of daily wear without corroding or losing their shape, the Chesterf864 delivers excellent value.
At a Glance
Chesterfield 55XL Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Rectangular shape provides more angular contrast for round faces
- Similar metal construction and quality
- Comparable price point ($85-$86)
- XL sizing for larger faces
Cons:
- Heavier than titanium if not titanium construction
- Rectangular shape may feel more formal/less versatile
- May not soften angular features as effectively as round frames
Chesterfield Chesterf51 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Similar Chesterfield quality and construction
- Comparable pricing at $88.25
- Alternative frame shape for different style preferences
- Same brand reliability and warranty
Cons:
- Frame shape may not suit all face types as universally as round
- Specific shape details would determine best face shape match
- May lack the lightweight titanium advantage of the 864