Product Details
Color Details
Size DetailsFrequently Asked Questions
What is Flexon memory metal and how does it work?
Are the Flexon W3020 frames suitable for progressive lenses?
What face shapes look best in cat-eye glasses like the W3020?
Can I get prescription lenses in the Flexon W3020?
How do I know if the W3020 will fit me?
Are Flexon frames really more durable than regular metal frames?
Compare With Similar Frames
How the Flexon W3020 Eyeglasses stacks up against the closest alternatives we carry.
- Slightly smaller 52-17mm sizing may fit narrower faces better
- Plastic injected temples add decorative detailing
- Same memory metal durability in the bridge
- Slightly different sizing (52-17-140) may fit some face shapes better
- Part of the same Flexon women's collection with memory metal technology
- Available in sophisticated color options including Gold and Plum
- Oval shape is more universally flattering across all face shapes
- Same memory metal durability and lightweight construction
- Similar price range ($51.50 starting)
Read the full comparison
Flexon W3020 vs Similar Women's Frames
If you're considering the W3020, you're likely drawn to Flexon's memory metal technology and the cat-eye shape. Here's how it compares to other frames in our Flexon women's collection.
W3020 vs W3012: Size and Temple Style
The Flexon W3012 is the W3020's closest sibling. Both feature the same memory metal bridge and cat-eye shape, but the W3012 has a narrower 17mm bridge (vs 21mm on the W3020) and plastic injected temples with decorative detailing. If you have a narrower nose or prefer a slightly smaller frame, the W3012 is worth considering. However, the W3020's larger lens height makes it better for progressive lenses, and the wider bridge fits more face shapes comfortably. Both start at the same price.
W3020 vs W3035: Premium Alternative
The Flexon W3035 offers similar women's styling with memory metal technology but at a higher price point ($109.54-$116.31). The W3035 has a 17mm bridge and different frame geometry. Choose the W3020 if you want the best value and a wider bridge fit; consider the W3035 if you prefer its specific color options (Gold, Plum) and don't mind the premium.
W3020 vs 635: Cat-Eye vs Oval
If you like Flexon's durability but aren't sure about the cat-eye shape, the Flexon 635 offers an oval alternative. The 635 is more universally flattering and has a classic look, while the W3020's cat-eye adds definition and a fashion-forward edge. For round or square faces that benefit from the structure a cat-eye provides, stick with the W3020. For heart or oval faces that don't need as much angularity, the 635 is a softer option.
Bottom line: The W3020 offers the best combination of cat-eye style, progressive-lens compatibility, and value in Flexon's women's collection. Its 21mm bridge fits more people comfortably than narrower alternatives, and the 41mm lens height gives you flexibility for any prescription type.
At a Glance
Flexon W3012 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Slightly smaller 52-17mm sizing may fit narrower faces better
- Plastic injected temples add decorative detailing
- Same memory metal durability in the bridge
- Available at the same starting price point
Cons:
- Smaller lens height (not specified but likely less than 41mm) may limit progressive lens compatibility
- Fewer color options (3 vs 4)
- Less vertical space for higher prescriptions
Flexon W3035 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Slightly different sizing (52-17-140) may fit some face shapes better
- Part of the same Flexon women's collection with memory metal technology
- Available in sophisticated color options including Gold and Plum
Cons:
- Higher price point ($109.54-$116.31 vs $51.50 starting)
- Narrower bridge (17mm vs 21mm) may not fit all nose widths
- Different frame geometry may not suit all face shapes
Flexon 635 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Oval shape is more universally flattering across all face shapes
- Same memory metal durability and lightweight construction
- Similar price range ($51.50 starting)
- Features decorative temple detailing for added visual interest
Cons:
- Lacks the definition and lift that cat-eye shapes provide
- Oval shape may not add as much structure to round faces
- Different aesthetic—more classic than fashion-forward