5% OFF ALL STORE - USE COUPON CODE "HIFALL26" EXCLUDING BRANDS: RAY-BAN, OAKLEY, COSTA DEL MAR, PERSOL, PRADA, RAY-BAN META, OAKLEY META & MIU MIU
940639 - Black - Prizm Golf
Oakley Sutro 9406A Sunglasses
$193.00

You save 0%

Color

Size

Oakley Sutro 9406A Sunglasses

940642 - Black - Prizm Slate / 60

  • Ships within 1 to 5 Days

    Shipping information is provided by the manufacturer.

0OO9406A_940642_60137
$193.00

You save 0%

Color

Size

  • Free Shipping
    Free Shipping
  • Price Match
    Price Match
  • Easy Returns
    Easy Returns
  • Licensed Opticians
    Licensed Opticians
DESCRIPTION RATINGS & REVIEWS PRESCRIPTION GUIDE

These Oakley SUTRO (A) frames feature a Full Rim design. Oakley's Plutonite Lenses offer top UV Protection filtering 100% of all UVA, UVB, UVC and harmful blue light up to 400mm. Patented High Definition Optics (HDO) provides superior optical clarity and razor-sharp vision at every angle. Options featuring PRIZM Lens Technology are designed to enhance color, contrast and detail so athletes can make the most of any activityThese frames are designed with light-weight O-Matter material for superior comfort and durability. These Oakley Sun frames feature a Rectangle shape perfect for round or oval shaped faces.

Product DetailsProduct Details

Color DetailsColor Details

Size DetailsSize Details

Customer Reviews

Based on 4 reviews
75%
(3)
25%
(1)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
J
Jony Chandra

Great price.

N
Nashaly Maldonado
Good

Good

C
Court Maple
First time buyer

Prompt, professional and easy to shop.

J
Jony Chandra

Great price.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Oakley Sutro 9406A and the standard 9406?

The 9406A is the Low Bridge Fit (formerly called Asia Fit) version with larger, flatter nose pads and a slightly narrower frame width (5.31 inches vs 5.47 inches). It's designed for people with flatter nose bridges, higher cheekbones, or narrower faces. The frame geometry is otherwise identical, and both versions accept the same replacement lenses.

Can I get prescription lenses for the Oakley Sutro 9406A?

Yes. While Oakley doesn't offer direct prescription lenses for the Sutro shield design, several companies make prescription inserts that clip behind the original lens. These inserts attach to the nose pad area and support single vision, progressive, and high prescriptions while preserving the frame's UV protection and tint.

What is Oakley Prizm lens technology and is it worth it?

Prizm is Oakley's contrast-enhancement technology that selectively filters light wavelengths to make specific colors more vivid and details sharper. Developed over 15 years using hyperspectral imaging, the dye is melted into the lens material itself (not just a coating), so it won't wear off. Prizm lenses are tuned for specific environments—Road, Trail, Golf, Snow—and are widely praised for reducing eye fatigue and improving reaction time.

Are Oakley Sutro sunglasses good for cycling?

Yes. The Sutro was originally designed for urban cyclists and offers a massive, unobstructed field of view with full coverage that blocks wind and debris. The Unobtainium nose pads grip better when wet, the 140mm temples fit under helmets, and the shield lens eliminates frame edges in your peripheral vision. Many cyclists prefer the Sutro for road and gravel riding, though some choose the Radar EV Path for a more traditional, aerodynamic look.

Do the Oakley Sutro 9406A sunglasses have UV protection?

Yes. All Oakley Sutro lenses are made from Plutonite, a high-purity polycarbonate that blocks 100% of UVA, UVB, UVC, and harmful blue light up to 400nm. This protection is built into the lens material itself, not applied as a coating, so it won't degrade over time. The lenses also meet ANSI Z80.3 impact resistance standards.

What face shapes work best with the Oakley Sutro 9406A?

The Sutro's rectangular shield shape works well on round and oval faces by adding angularity. The 9406A Low Bridge Fit is specifically designed for people with flatter nose bridges, higher cheekbones, or narrower facial features. If standard sunglasses slide down your nose or touch your cheeks, the 9406A's larger nose pads and narrower frame width will provide a more secure, comfortable fit.

Compare With Similar Frames

How the Oakley Sutro 9406A Sunglasses stacks up against the closest alternatives we carry.

Read the full comparison

Oakley Sutro 9406A vs. Standard Fit and Competing Models

Choosing between the Sutro 9406A Low Bridge Fit and other Oakley performance frames comes down to fit, coverage, and style preference. Here's how the 9406A stacks up against its closest competitors in our catalog.

Sutro 9406A (Low Bridge Fit) vs. Sutro 9406 (Standard Fit)

The most common question: should you choose Low Bridge Fit or Standard? The 9406A features larger, flatter nose pads and a narrower frame width (5.31" vs 5.47"). If standard sunglasses slide down your nose or rest on your cheeks, the 9406A will fit better. The frames are otherwise identical—same lens options, same shield coverage, same O-Matter construction. According to Oakley Forum members, the nose pads are the only real difference, and they're swappable if you want to convert between fits. The standard 9406 starts at a slightly lower price ($121 vs $134) and offers wider coverage for larger faces.

Sutro 9406A vs. Sutro Lite 9463

The Sutro Lite removes the bottom rim for a semi-rimless look that opens up your lower field of view. It's lighter, ventilates better (less fogging), and includes Unobtainium temple grips that the full Sutro lacks. Cyclists who sweat heavily often prefer the Lite for its airflow. However, the full-frame 9406A offers more protection from wind and debris, and some riders prefer the bold shield aesthetic. The Lite starts at $161, making the 9406A the more affordable option if you want maximum coverage.

Sutro 9406A vs. Radar EV Path 9208

This is the modern shield vs. classic sport frame debate. The Radar EV Path has a smaller, more aerodynamic profile with a proven track record among pro cyclists. It grips extremely well (rubberized temples and nose), fits under helmets easily, and works for running and other sports. But the lens sits lower in your field of view, and you'll see frame edges in your periphery. The Sutro 9406A offers a massive, unobstructed view with more coverage—better for blocking wind on fast descents or debris on gravel roads. The Radar EV Path looks more traditional; the Sutro makes a bolder statement. If you prioritize peripheral vision and modern style, choose the Sutro. If you want a time-tested, multi-sport frame with maximum security, go Radar.

Our take: The Sutro 9406A is the best choice if you have a flatter nose bridge and want maximum shield coverage with Oakley's latest Prizm lens technology. It's the modern performance frame that works on the bike and off.

At a Glance

Oakley Sutro 9406 Sunglasses

Pros:

  • Wider frame (5.47" vs 5.31") provides more coverage for larger faces
  • Standard nose pads work better for higher nose bridges
  • Slightly lower price point ($121–$235 vs $134–$235)
  • More widely available in retail stores

Cons:

  • May slide down on flatter nose bridges
  • Can rest uncomfortably on cheeks for some face shapes
  • Wider frame may overwhelm narrower faces
  • Standard nose pads offer less surface area for grip

Oakley Sutro Lite 9463 Sunglasses

Pros:

  • Semi-rimless design removes bottom frame from field of view
  • Better ventilation reduces fogging
  • Lighter weight than full-frame Sutro
  • Unobtainium temple grips (full Sutro has smooth plastic temples)
  • More modern, minimalist aesthetic

Cons:

  • Less protection from debris and wind without full rim
  • Slightly less durable frame structure
  • Higher starting price ($161 vs $134)
  • Some prefer the bold look of the full shield

Oakley Radar EV Path 9208 Sunglasses

Pros:

  • More aerodynamic, lower-profile silhouette
  • Extremely secure fit—grips tenaciously even on rough terrain
  • Rubberized temples grip helmet vents better
  • Time-tested design trusted by pro cyclists
  • Better for multi-sport use (running, trail sports)

Cons:

  • Smaller field of view—frame and lens edges visible in periphery
  • Less coverage from wind and debris
  • Dated look compared to modern shield designs
  • Lens vents can cause eye dryness at high speeds

Ask our AI

Ask Designer Optics