Product Details
Color Details
Size DetailsFrequently Asked Questions
Are the Gucci Logo GG1138O eyeglasses prescription-ready?
What materials are the Gucci GG1138O frames made from?
What are the measurements of the Gucci GG1138O eyeglasses?
What face shapes work best with the Gucci GG1138O square frames?
What is the Gucci Lettering logo detail on the GG1138O?
Are the Gucci GG1138O frames comfortable for all-day wear?
Compare With Similar Frames
How the Gucci Logo GG1138O Eyeglasses stacks up against the closest alternatives we carry.
- Cat-eye shape offers a softer, more feminine aesthetic that flatters round and heart-shaped faces
- Slightly lower price point ($182.73–$207.58 vs. $192.16–$196.73)
- Narrower 18mm bridge may fit smaller nose bridges more comfortably
- Part of the same Gucci Logo collection with consistent design language
- Comparable price range ($199.05–$254.92) for similar luxury positioning
- Full-rim acetate construction ensures durability and prescription compatibility
Read the full comparison
Gucci Logo GG1138O vs. GG1133O: Square vs. Cat-Eye
Both the Gucci Logo GG1138O and GG1133O belong to Gucci's signature Logo collection, sharing the same premium Italian acetate construction, Gucci Lettering temple logos, and contrasting metal knocker end pieces. The key difference lies in frame shape: the GG1138O features a bold, contemporary square silhouette that offers unisex versatility and modern sophistication, while the GG1133O showcases a cat-eye shape with vintage-inspired femininity.
The GG1138O measures 52-20-145mm with a wider 20mm bridge, making it ideal for medium-to-large faces and those seeking a more substantial, gender-neutral aesthetic. The square shape provides excellent contrast for round and oval faces, and the larger lens height (41.2mm) accommodates progressive lenses with ease. Customer reviews consistently praise the GG1138O's all-day comfort and balanced weight distribution.
The GG1133O, by contrast, features a narrower 18mm bridge and softer cat-eye angles that flatter heart-shaped and round faces with a more delicate, retro-chic vibe. At $182.73–$207.58, it's slightly more affordable than the GG1138O ($192.16–$196.73), though some customers note it runs large and may require professional adjustment. The cat-eye shape is perfect for those who embrace vintage glamour, but may feel less versatile in conservative professional settings.
Choose the GG1138O if: You want bold, unisex square frames with modern sophistication, need excellent progressive lens compatibility, or prefer a more substantial, architectural look that works equally well in business and casual settings.
Choose the GG1133O if: You love vintage-inspired cat-eye frames with feminine flair, have a smaller nose bridge (18mm vs. 20mm), or want to make a retro fashion statement with slightly softer lines and a lower price point.
At a Glance
Gucci Logo GG1133O Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Cat-eye shape offers a softer, more feminine aesthetic that flatters round and heart-shaped faces
- Slightly lower price point ($182.73–$207.58 vs. $192.16–$196.73)
- Narrower 18mm bridge may fit smaller nose bridges more comfortably
- Vintage-inspired silhouette adds retro charm and personality
Cons:
- Cat-eye shape may feel less versatile or professional in conservative settings
- Smaller lens height may limit compatibility with some progressive lens designs
- More overtly feminine styling may not suit those seeking unisex frames
- Customer reviews note frames can run slightly large and may require adjustment
Gucci Logo GG0958O Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Part of the same Gucci Logo collection with consistent design language
- Comparable price range ($199.05–$254.92) for similar luxury positioning
- Full-rim acetate construction ensures durability and prescription compatibility
- Offers alternative frame shape for customers who want Logo collection branding
Cons:
- Different frame shape may not provide the same bold square aesthetic
- Slightly higher price point depending on color selection
- May have different fit characteristics requiring in-person comparison
- Less customer review data available to assess real-world comfort and durability