Frequently Asked Questions
Are Kliik K-775 eyeglasses suitable for prescription lenses?
What face shapes work best with the K-775's modified square frame?
What is acetate and why is it better than regular plastic?
What are the measurements of the Kliik K-775?
How do I care for acetate eyeglass frames?
Are Kliik eyeglasses good quality?
Compare With Similar Frames
How the Kliik K-775 Eyeglasses stacks up against the closest alternatives we carry.
- Virtually identical fit and shape to K-775
- Same premium acetate construction
- Similar two-tone color aesthetic
- Modified square shape in same style family
- Premium acetate with bold color options
- Designed for smaller face widths
- Round shape softens angular features more than square
- Same premium acetate construction
- Similar price point ($129.46–$130.14)
Read the full comparison
Kliik K-775 vs. Similar Kliik Frames
If you're drawn to the K-775's modified square shape and two-tone acetate design, you're likely considering other frames in Kliik's women's collection. Here's how the K-775 compares to its closest siblings.
K-775 vs. K-772: Nearly Identical Twins
The Kliik K-772 is the K-775's closest match—both share the same modified square silhouette, full-rim acetate construction, and two-tone color blocking approach. The frames have identical measurements (48-17-135mm) and the same price point at $130.14. The primary difference is the color combinations: the K-772 offers its own set of dual-tone options with slightly different transitions between the upper and lower frame sections. If you like the K-775's shape but want to explore alternative color palettes, the K-772 is worth viewing side-by-side. There's no functional advantage to either—it's purely a matter of which color story speaks to you.
K-775 vs. K-736: More Color Drama
The Kliik K-736 takes a similar modified square approach but with potentially bolder color layering and a slightly higher price range ($130.14–$188.75). Both frames target the same small-to-medium face width and share Kliik's Scandinavian design DNA. The K-736 may offer more dramatic color contrasts—think turquoise multi-tones and moss terracotta combinations—making it the choice for customers who want maximum visual impact. If the K-775's color options feel too subtle, the K-736 pushes the envelope further while maintaining the same quality acetate construction and comfortable fit.
K-775 vs. K-751: Square vs. Round
For a completely different aesthetic within the same brand, the Kliik K-751 offers a round frame alternative. While the K-775's modified square adds structure and definition, the K-751's round shape softens angular facial features—making it a better match for square or rectangular face shapes. Both use premium acetate and sit at nearly identical price points ($129.46–$130.14). The decision comes down to your face shape and style preference: angular frames for a contemporary, structured look, or round frames for a softer, more vintage-inspired aesthetic.
Our take: The K-775 hits the sweet spot for customers who want a modern square frame with enough color interest to stand out, but not so much that it overwhelms. If you're between the K-775 and K-772, view both color options and choose based on which palette complements your wardrobe. If you want bolder colors, go K-736. If you have a square face or prefer softer lines, the K-751 is your frame.
At a Glance
Kliik K-772 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Virtually identical fit and shape to K-775
- Same premium acetate construction
- Similar two-tone color aesthetic
- Same price point at $130.14
Cons:
- Different color options may not suit all preferences
- No significant functional differences to help decide
Kliik K-736 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Modified square shape in same style family
- Premium acetate with bold color options
- Designed for smaller face widths
- Similar Scandinavian design aesthetic
Cons:
- Higher price range ($130.14–$188.75)
- May have slightly different proportions
Kliik K-751 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Round shape softens angular features more than square
- Same premium acetate construction
- Similar price point ($129.46–$130.14)
- Better for square or rectangular face shapes
Cons:
- Round vs. square is a significant style difference
- May feel less contemporary than angular designs



