Frequently Asked Questions
Are the Oakley Dehaven 8054 eyeglasses prescription-ready?
What is NanO-Matter and how is it different from regular frame materials?
What are Unobtainium earsocks and why do they matter?
Should I choose the 53mm or 55mm size for the Oakley Dehaven?
What inspired the design of the Oakley Dehaven eyeglasses?
Can I use my vision insurance with the Oakley Dehaven frames?
Compare With Similar Frames
How the Oakley Dehaven 8054 Eyeglasses stacks up against the closest alternatives we carry.
- Lower starting price ($119 vs $228)
- Full O-Matter construction for consistent material throughout
- Available in four different sizes for more fit options
- Most affordable option starting at $95
- Sleek, minimalist rectangular design
- Lightweight O-Matter frame construction
Read the full comparison
Oakley Dehaven 8054 vs. Airdrop 8046 vs. Plank 2.0 8081
Choosing between these three Oakley rectangular prescription frames comes down to your priorities: premium materials and distinctive style, proven popularity and fit options, or minimalist design and value.
The Dehaven Advantage: Premium Materials Meet Surf Style
The Dehaven 8054 stands out with its mixed-material construction and surf-inspired design. The NanO-Matter front is 67% thinner and three times stronger than the acetate used in many frames, while the stainless steel temples with crosshatch detailing add a unique visual element you won't find on the Airdrop or Plank 2.0. If you want a frame that makes a statement while delivering cutting-edge materials, the Dehaven justifies its higher price point ($228-$242).
The Airdrop: Proven Performance and Versatility
The Airdrop 8046 ($119-$227) is one of Oakley's most popular prescription frames for good reason. It offers full O-Matter construction throughout, comes in four different sizes (vs. two for the Dehaven), and features the same Unobtainium earsocks and Three-Point Fit technology. If you prioritize having more size options and want a frame with a strong track record, the Airdrop is an excellent choice. However, it lacks the Dehaven's premium NanO-Matter construction and distinctive styling details.
The Plank 2.0: Minimalist Style, Maximum Value
At $95-$187, the Plank 2.0 8081 is the most budget-friendly option. It delivers a clean, professional rectangular look with lightweight O-Matter construction. The Plank 2.0 is ideal if you prefer understated styling and want to save money for premium lens upgrades. The trade-off is that you miss out on the Dehaven's innovative NanO-Matter material and the surf-inspired design elements that give it character.
Our Recommendation
Choose the Dehaven 8054 if you want the most advanced frame materials, appreciate distinctive design details, and value the surf-inspired aesthetic. The NanO-Matter construction and crosshatch temple detailing make it the most unique option.
Choose the Airdrop 8046 if you want proven performance, need more size options, or prefer a more traditional rectangular look. It's the safe choice with broad appeal.
Choose the Plank 2.0 8081 if you prioritize value and minimalist styling, or if you want to allocate more of your budget toward premium prescription lenses rather than frame features.
At a Glance
Oakley Airdrop 8046 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Lower starting price ($119 vs $228)
- Full O-Matter construction for consistent material throughout
- Available in four different sizes for more fit options
- Features Oakley's Three-Point Fit system and Unobtainium earsocks
- Proven popular design with strong customer following
Cons:
- Less distinctive styling—no mixed materials or surf-inspired details
- Heavier O-Matter construction vs. the Dehaven's ultra-light NanO-Matter
- More generic rectangular look without the crosshatch temple detailing
- Fewer premium material innovations compared to the Dehaven
Oakley Plank 2.0 8081 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Most affordable option starting at $95
- Sleek, minimalist rectangular design
- Lightweight O-Matter frame construction
- Clean, professional look suitable for business settings
- Proven fit and comfort for all-day wear
Cons:
- No premium NanO-Matter construction
- Lacks the distinctive surf-inspired design elements
- Simpler temple design without crosshatch detailing
- Less unique styling compared to the Dehaven's mixed materials



