Frequently Asked Questions
Are the Oakley Sutro Ti 6013 sunglasses prescription-ready?
How much do the Oakley Sutro Ti sunglasses weigh?
What is Oakley Prizm lens technology and how does it work?
What are the benefits of titanium frames compared to plastic frames?
How does the Sutro Ti compare to the standard Oakley Sutro?
Do the Sutro Ti sunglasses provide UV protection?
Compare With Similar Frames
How the Oakley Sutro Ti 6013 Sunglasses stacks up against the closest alternatives we carry.
- Significantly lower price point ($121-$235 vs $276-$293)
- Larger frame size (140×59mm lens) for bigger heads and faces
- Wider availability of color and lens options
- More affordable ($161-$246 vs $276-$293)
- Semi-rimless design improves ventilation and reduces fogging
- Same frame width as the Ti for similar fit
- Better fit for smaller faces and narrow bridges
- Lower price point ($193-$203)
- Full Prizm lens ecosystem available
Read the full comparison
Oakley Sutro Ti 6013 vs. Sutro 9406 vs. Sutro Lite 9463
Choosing between the Sutro Ti and its O Matter siblings comes down to three factors: weight, fit adjustability, and budget. Here's how they stack up.
Sutro Ti 6013 vs. Sutro 9406: Titanium or Plastic?
The original Sutro 9406 is the full-frame O Matter version with a larger lens (140×59mm) designed for bigger heads. It weighs 160 grams and uses fixed nosepads. The Sutro Ti 6013 weighs just 27 grams, features adjustable nosepads, and uses a titanium frame that's corrosion-resistant and hypoallergenic. Both share the same Prizm lens options and cylindrical coverage.
If you prioritize lightweight comfort, adjustable fit, and premium materials, the Ti is worth the extra cost. If you have a larger face or want to save money, the standard Sutro delivers the same optical performance in a proven O Matter package. The weight difference is significant—riders report the Ti "disappears" on your face during long rides, while the heavier Sutro 9406 can feel more noticeable after several hours.
Sutro Ti 6013 vs. Sutro Lite 9463: Semi-Rimless or Full Titanium?
The Sutro Lite 9463 is the semi-rimless O Matter version that matches the Ti's frame width, making it the closest fit comparison. The Lite improves ventilation over the full-frame Sutro and weighs less than the 9406, but here's the catch: the weight difference between the Lite and the Ti is only about 1 gram. You're paying a premium for the titanium material, adjustable nosepads, and the refined metal aesthetic—not for meaningful weight savings.
Cycling testers note the Lite ventilates slightly better due to the semi-rimless design, which can reduce fogging in humid conditions. The Ti, however, offers superior durability and the ability to fine-tune fit via the adjustable nosepads. For riders who sweat heavily or have a hard-to-fit nose bridge, the Ti's adjustability is a real advantage. For those on a budget who don't need adjustable fit, the Sutro Lite is the smarter buy.
Our Recommendation
The Oakley Sutro Ti 6013 is the best choice if you want the lightest, most adjustable, and most premium version of the Sutro design. It's ideal for riders who log serious miles, value titanium's durability and corrosion resistance, and appreciate the refined look of a metal frame. If you have a smaller face, consider the Sutro S 9462 instead—it's a scaled-down version with the same shield coverage in a more compact size. For budget-conscious buyers, the Sutro Lite 9463 offers nearly identical weight and fit in a semi-rimless O Matter frame at a lower price.
At a Glance
Oakley Sutro 9406 Sunglasses
Pros:
- Significantly lower price point ($121-$235 vs $276-$293)
- Larger frame size (140×59mm lens) for bigger heads and faces
- Wider availability of color and lens options
- Same Prizm lens technology and cylindrical coverage
Cons:
- Heavier (160g vs 27g)—noticeable on long rides
- Fixed nosepads instead of adjustable fit
- O Matter plastic less corrosion-resistant than titanium
- No premium metal aesthetic
Oakley Sutro Lite 9463 Sunglasses
Pros:
- More affordable ($161-$246 vs $276-$293)
- Semi-rimless design improves ventilation and reduces fogging
- Same frame width as the Ti for similar fit
- Lighter than the full-frame Sutro 9406
Cons:
- Still heavier than titanium (weight difference is minimal—only about 1 gram less for the Ti)
- Fixed nosepads—no adjustability
- Plastic frame less durable in extreme conditions
- Semi-rimless design may feel less secure for some riders
Oakley Sutro S 9462 Sunglasses
Pros:
- Better fit for smaller faces and narrow bridges
- Lower price point ($193-$203)
- Full Prizm lens ecosystem available
- Same cylindrical shield design in a more compact size
Cons:
- Smaller lens size reduces coverage and peripheral protection
- O Matter plastic construction—heavier and less premium
- Fixed nosepads
- Not ideal for medium to large faces



