Frequently Asked Questions
Are Oakley Tailback 2.0 eyeglasses prescription-ready?
How much do Oakley Tailback 2.0 frames weigh?
What is Unobtainium and why is it on these frames?
What face shapes work best with the Tailback 2.0?
Can I use these frames for sports or active wear?
What's the difference between the Tailback 2.0 and other Oakley titanium frames?
Compare With Similar Frames
How the Oakley Tailback 2.0 5090 Eyeglasses stacks up against the closest alternatives we carry.
- Full-rim design provides more lens protection and support for stronger prescriptions
- Thicker brow architecture creates a bolder, more defined look
- Slightly lower price point ($184.84–$318.00 vs $500.00)
- Much more affordable at $95.33–$187.00
- Durable O-Matter frame material is lightweight and impact-resistant
- Full-rim design better conceals lens edges for higher prescriptions
Read the full comparison
Oakley Tailback 2.0 vs Metal Plate Ti vs Plank 2.0: Which Frame Is Right for You?
Choosing between Oakley's premium eyeglasses comes down to your priorities: weight, style, and budget. Here's how the Tailback 2.0 stacks up against two popular alternatives.
Tailback 2.0 vs Metal Plate Ti: The Titanium Showdown
Both frames use aerospace-grade titanium, but the Tailback 2.0 takes minimalism further with its semi-rimless design. This means less frame material and even lighter weight—ideal if you want glasses you'll barely notice. The Metal Plate Ti counters with a full-rim construction that offers more lens protection and works better for stronger prescriptions where lens edges might be visible. The Metal Plate Ti's thicker brow architecture creates a bolder look, while the Tailback 2.0's angular stem design and cleaner lines appeal to those who prefer modern, understated style. Price-wise, the Metal Plate Ti starts lower ($184.84 vs $500.00), making it the value pick in the titanium category.
Tailback 2.0 vs Plank 2.0: Premium Titanium vs Practical O-Matter
The price difference here is significant—the Plank 2.0 costs roughly half what the Tailback 2.0 does. That savings comes from using Oakley's proprietary O-Matter material instead of titanium. O-Matter is still lightweight and durable, but it can't match titanium's strength-to-weight ratio or premium feel. The Plank 2.0's full-rim design is more traditional and better at hiding lens edges if you have a higher prescription. However, the Tailback 2.0's semi-rimless construction and Unobtainium earsocks make it the superior choice for active wear and all-day comfort. If budget is your main concern, the Plank 2.0 delivers solid Oakley quality at a more accessible price. If you want the lightest, most advanced frame Oakley offers, the Tailback 2.0 justifies its premium.
Our Recommendation
The Tailback 2.0 is the right choice if you prioritize lightweight comfort, modern minimalist design, and don't mind investing in premium materials. Its semi-rimless titanium construction and distinctive angular temples make it one of Oakley's most sophisticated eyeglass designs. For those with stronger prescriptions or tighter budgets, the Metal Plate Ti or Plank 2.0 offer excellent alternatives with their own strengths.
At a Glance
Oakley Metal Plate Ti 5153 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Full-rim design provides more lens protection and support for stronger prescriptions
- Thicker brow architecture creates a bolder, more defined look
- Slightly lower price point ($184.84–$318.00 vs $500.00)
- Rectangular shape with more traditional styling
Cons:
- Heavier than the Tailback 2.0 due to full-rim construction
- Less minimalist aesthetic with more visible frame material
- Standard temple design lacks the distinctive angular architecture of the Tailback 2.0
Oakley Plank 2.0 8081 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Much more affordable at $95.33–$187.00
- Durable O-Matter frame material is lightweight and impact-resistant
- Full-rim design better conceals lens edges for higher prescriptions
- Adjustable wire core temples for customized fit
- Available in three sizes for better fit options
Cons:
- Heavier than titanium construction
- Plastic frame material less premium than aerospace-grade titanium
- Full-rim design is less minimalist and modern
- No Unobtainium earsocks for enhanced grip during activity
Oakley Holbrook Ti Rx 5068 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Iconic Holbrook design with proven style appeal
- Square lens shape offers a different look from the Tailback's rectangle
- Similar titanium construction with lightweight comfort
- Grip-fit clear nosepads for adjustable fit
- Comparable price at $203.95–$387.00
Cons:
- Full-rim design adds more weight than the Tailback 2.0's semi-rimless construction
- Less distinctive temple architecture
- Square shape may not suit all face types as well as the Tailback's rectangular design
- More traditional styling lacks the modern minimalist edge



