Product Details
Color Details
Size DetailsFrequently Asked Questions
Are the Original Penguin Hopper 2.0 frames compatible with progressive lenses?
What are the exact measurements of the Hopper 2.0 eyeglasses?
How do I care for acetate eyeglass frames?
What face shapes work best with rectangular eyeglasses?
Does Original Penguin eyewear come with a warranty?
Can I add clip-on sunglasses to these frames?
Compare With Similar Frames
How the Original Penguin The Hopper 2.0 Eyeglasses stacks up against the closest alternatives we carry.
- Round/oval shape offers a softer, more vintage look
- Keyhole bridge detail adds classic elegance
- Same acetate quality and 1950s heritage
- Square shape provides maximum definition and structure
- Highly rated by customers for quality and fit
- Available in 9 color options (more variety)
- Similar rectangular shape with subtle design variations
- Same price range and prescription compatibility
- Full acetate construction with vintage styling
Read the full comparison
Hopper 2.0 vs. Other Original Penguin Frames: Which Rectangle Is Right for You?
If you're drawn to the Original Penguin Hopper 2.0's retro-inspired rectangular shape, you might also be considering other frames in the collection. Here's how the Hopper 2.0 stacks up against its closest siblings.
Hopper 2.0 vs. The Stewart: Rectangle vs. Round
The most common decision customers face is choosing between the Original Penguin Stewart (round/oval) and the Hopper 2.0 (rectangular). Both are full-rim acetate frames at the same price point ($113–$120), both offer the same 1950s heritage styling, and both work with progressive lenses.
The difference comes down to face shape and personal style. The Hopper 2.0's rectangular shape adds definition and structure—ideal if you have a round or oval face and want frames that create visual balance. The Stewart's round shape offers a softer, more vintage-intellectual look that complements square or angular faces. The Stewart also features a keyhole bridge for added classic detail, while the Hopper 2.0 keeps things clean and modern.
Choose the Hopper 2.0 if: You want a modern rectangular shape that works well for business or casual settings, you have a rounder face, or you prefer the two-tone gradient acetate finish available in the tortoise colorway.
Hopper 2.0 vs. The Clyde: Soft Rectangle vs. Bold Square
The Original Penguin Clyde takes the rectangular concept further into square territory—more angular, more structured, and available in 9 color options. Customer reviews for the Clyde are enthusiastic, with wearers praising the fit and durability. One reviewer noted they're on their third pair and use old frames as backups.
The Clyde's square shape provides maximum definition but can overwhelm smaller faces. The Hopper 2.0's softer rectangular proportions (51mm lens width) strike a middle ground between the Clyde's boldness and the Stewart's roundness.
Choose the Hopper 2.0 if: You want a rectangular frame that's versatile and not too bold, or if you prefer the gradient acetate finish over solid colors.
Hopper 2.0 vs. The Princeton: Subtle Style Variations
The Original Penguin Princeton is another rectangular acetate frame at the same price tier. The differences are subtle—mostly in temple design and color offerings. Both frames share the same prescription compatibility, acetate construction, and retro aesthetic.
This comparison comes down to minor aesthetic preferences. If you're choosing between the two, focus on which color options appeal to you and which temple style you prefer.
The bottom line: The Hopper 2.0 is the best all-around rectangular option in the Original Penguin lineup if you want a versatile, modern shape with distinctive two-tone color options. It's less bold than the Clyde, more contemporary than the Stewart, and offers the same quality acetate construction and prescription compatibility across the entire collection.
At a Glance
Original Penguin THE STEWART Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Round/oval shape offers a softer, more vintage look
- Keyhole bridge detail adds classic elegance
- Same acetate quality and 1950s heritage
- Works well for square or rectangular face shapes
Cons:
- Round shape may not provide as much definition for rounder faces
- Slightly smaller lens size (49mm vs 51mm)
- Less modern aesthetic compared to rectangular frames
Original Penguin THE CLYDE Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Square shape provides maximum definition and structure
- Highly rated by customers for quality and fit
- Available in 9 color options (more variety)
- Same prescription compatibility and acetate construction
Cons:
- More angular look may be too bold for some preferences
- Square frames can overwhelm smaller faces
- Similar price point offers no cost advantage
Original Penguin THE PRINCETON Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Similar rectangular shape with subtle design variations
- Same price range and prescription compatibility
- Full acetate construction with vintage styling
- Alternative color and finish options
Cons:
- Very similar to Hopper 2.0—choice comes down to minor aesthetic preferences
- No significant functional differences
- Same care requirements and durability profile