Product Details
Color Details
Size DetailsFrequently Asked Questions
Are the Under Armour UA0012 sunglasses prescription-compatible?
What's the difference between polarized and non-polarized versions of the UA0012?
Do Under Armour UA0012 sunglasses provide UV protection?
What size face do the UA0012 sunglasses fit?
Are Under Armour sunglasses durable enough for sports?
What activities are the UA0012 sunglasses best suited for?
Compare With Similar Frames
How the Under Armour Ua0012 Sunglasses stacks up against the closest alternatives we carry.
- Oakley Prizm lens technology enhances color and contrast for specific sports
- Interchangeable lens system allows you to swap lenses for different conditions
- Unobtainium nose pads and ear socks increase grip with perspiration
- Similar price range ($64-$79) to the UA0012
- Bold, street-style aesthetic appeals to younger demographics
- Full-rim construction may offer slightly more lens protection
Read the full comparison
Under Armour UA0012 vs Oakley Flak 2.0 XL vs Arnette Catfish: Which Sports Sunglasses Are Right for You?
Choosing the right performance sunglasses depends on your budget, activity level, and style preferences. Here's how the Under Armour UA0012 stacks up against two popular alternatives in our catalog.
Under Armour UA0012: Best Value for Active Lifestyles
At $46-$81, the UA0012 delivers serious performance technology without the premium price tag. The semi-rimless wraparound design keeps weight down while the Multiflection-coated polycarbonate lenses resist scratches and repel water. You get 100% UV protection, prescription compatibility, and non-slip rubber temple grips—everything you need for running, training, or everyday outdoor wear. The UA0012 works particularly well if you want one versatile pair that transitions from the gym to casual wear without looking overly technical.
Oakley Flak 2.0 XL: Premium Performance Technology
The Oakley Flak 2.0 XL ($146-$267) represents the high end of sports eyewear with Prizm lens technology that enhances color and contrast for specific activities. The interchangeable lens system lets you swap lenses based on conditions, and Unobtainium components actually grip better when you sweat. If you're a serious athlete training for competition or you demand the absolute best optical performance, the Flak 2.0 XL justifies its higher price. However, for recreational athletes and everyday wear, the UA0012 delivers comparable protection and fit at a fraction of the cost.
Arnette Catfish 4302: Sporty Style Meets Street Appeal
The Arnette Catfish ($64-$79) sits between the UA0012 and Flak 2.0 XL in price, offering a full-rim wraparound design with more of a surf/skate aesthetic. While it provides good coverage and UV protection, it lacks some of the technical features that make the UA0012 stand out—like advanced lens coatings and the ultra-lightweight semi-rimless construction. Choose the Catfish if style is your priority; choose the UA0012 if you want better performance features at a lower price.
The Bottom Line
The Under Armour UA0012 offers the best balance of performance, versatility, and value. You get professional-grade lens technology, prescription compatibility, and a secure athletic fit without paying for premium branding. Unless you need Oakley's interchangeable lens system or prefer Arnette's street style, the UA0012 delivers everything most active people need in a sport sunglass.
At a Glance
Oakley Flak 2.0 XL 9188 Sunglasses
Pros:
- Oakley Prizm lens technology enhances color and contrast for specific sports
- Interchangeable lens system allows you to swap lenses for different conditions
- Unobtainium nose pads and ear socks increase grip with perspiration
- Iconic Oakley brand with extensive athlete endorsements
Cons:
- Significantly higher price point ($146-$267 vs $46-$81)
- Heavier brand premium may not justify the cost for casual athletes
- More aggressive styling may not suit everyday wear as well
Arnette Catfish 4302 Sunglasses
Pros:
- Similar price range ($64-$79) to the UA0012
- Bold, street-style aesthetic appeals to younger demographics
- Full-rim construction may offer slightly more lens protection
- Arnette's surf/skate heritage brings a different style vibe
Cons:
- Less focused on pure athletic performance features
- May not have the same level of impact-resistant lens technology
- Heavier full-rim design compared to UA0012's lightweight half-rim
- Less emphasis on technical features like Multiflection coatings