Product Details
Color Details
Size DetailsFrequently Asked Questions
Are the Pure P 3007 eyeglasses prescription-ready?
What is the frame size of the Pure P 3007?
What's the difference between acetate and regular plastic frames?
Can these frames be adjusted for a better fit?
What face shapes work best with square eyeglass frames?
Who makes Pure eyeglasses?
Compare With Similar Frames
How the Pure P 3007 Eyeglasses stacks up against the closest alternatives we carry.
- Designer brand recognition with Guess logo detailing
- Slightly wider style variety within the model line
- May appeal to those seeking more embellished frames
- Lower price point ($86-$101.54)
- Lilly Pulitzer's signature preppy, vibrant style
- Strong brand following among certain demographics
- Lower price point
- Kensie brand offers playful, youthful designs
- Good option for those wanting a different brand aesthetic
Read the full comparison
Pure P 3007 vs. Similar Women's Acetate Frames
If you're considering the Pure P 3007, you're likely weighing it against other women's acetate prescription frames in the $85-$150 range. Here's how it stacks up against comparable options in our collection.
Pure P 3007 vs. Guess 2677 Eyeglasses
Both frames offer full-rim acetate construction and square shapes, but the Pure P 3007 leans heavily into minimalist design with clean lines and bold solid colors (Ruby, Eggplant, Dark Grey). The Guess 2677, priced slightly lower at $99.75-$107.08, brings more designer branding and embellishments. If you prefer frames that don't shout their logo and want that modern, understated look, the Pure P 3007 delivers. If you want recognizable designer branding, Guess is the move.
Pure P 3007 vs. Lilly Pulitzer TOPANGA
The Lilly Pulitzer TOPANGA ($86-$101.54) offers a preppy, vibrant aesthetic that contrasts with Pure's minimalist approach. Both use quality acetate, but the style personalities are distinct—Lilly Pulitzer skews more playful and colorful with signature brand patterns, while Pure keeps it clean and modern. The Pure P 3007 is the better choice if you want frames that work across multiple settings without a strong preppy vibe.
Pure P 3007 vs. Kensie PLAYFUL
The Kensie PLAYFUL ($86-$101.54) targets a similar demographic with youthful, trend-forward designs. The Pure P 3007, backed by Marchon's manufacturing expertise, offers a more refined minimalist aesthetic that ages better over time. Kensie frames may lean more into seasonal trends, while Pure's design philosophy focuses on versatile, mood-boosting color in a timeless silhouette. For long-term wearability and manufacturing quality, Pure has the edge.
Bottom line: The Pure P 3007 is your best bet if you want Marchon-quality acetate frames with a minimalist design, bold color options, and a modern aesthetic that doesn't rely on logos or embellishments. It's priced competitively at $147.69 and offers the durability and adjustability that acetate is known for.
At a Glance
Guess 2677 Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Designer brand recognition with Guess logo detailing
- Slightly wider style variety within the model line
- May appeal to those seeking more embellished frames
Cons:
- Typically higher price point ($99.75-$107.08 vs $147.69)
- May feature more branding/logo elements that some prefer to avoid
- Less minimalist aesthetic compared to Pure's clean design
Lilly Pulitzer TOPANGA Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Lower price point ($86-$101.54)
- Lilly Pulitzer's signature preppy, vibrant style
- Strong brand following among certain demographics
Cons:
- Different aesthetic—more preppy than minimalist
- May not offer the same bold solid color options
- Brand style may not appeal to those seeking understated frames
Kensie PLAYFUL Eyeglasses
Pros:
- Lower price point
- Kensie brand offers playful, youthful designs
- Good option for those wanting a different brand aesthetic
Cons:
- Different design philosophy—may be more trendy than timeless
- Pure offers more minimalist, versatile styling
- Marchon's manufacturing pedigree vs. Kensie's market positioning